Why negativity doesn't linger here
by
zen
Negative things, or negative words, are the kinds of things that do need to be said from time to time, but that isn't the kind of information that should linger around. This is why virtually all the negative things I have ever said about others, or their sites here, have been removed after a while.
It's the kind of information you get out there, but then ease off once everyone gets the point. To linger in negativity is to live a negative life, or at least computing life. I will be the first to admit that I have no qualms about speaking (or writing rather in this case) my mind, and don't mind being the rude but honest guy when I have to be, but the goal is always to do good things for the architecture and its users.
There are things that need to be said from time to time; that is a fact of life. After being said though, you should move on. My goal is always for the well being of computing on PowerPC, and in 2014 people can't stay in the 2007 bubble that Apple left PowerPC users in. Because of the Apple culture, there are many people who never want to let it go. They're addicted to the aesthetic and ease of use. This has caused a lot of these people who also blog to spread the illogic of staying with 2007 Apple software tech. Computing from the passenger seat with pride, and encouraging others to do so. It is because of these people promoting devolution to others that has caused me to react in negative ways.
Since the main goal here is to help the architecture in the modern day, and do it in a way that promotes user evolution, not devolution; I always promote that users challenge themselves. To push your own personal measuring stick past what you think the maximum length is. Taking the role I have also requires me to tell the truth about the backward advice of certain blogs/sites. It's a role that does weigh on me at times, but I am committed.
People who point out the honest and brutal truth are often seen as negative; even when all they're doing is telling truth. I will admit that I have also added insults here and there, but the ignorant and limited nature of these people upsets my evolved user instincts.
Once these things have been said, whether about individuals, or even companies like CleverFiles, I let them sit here for a month or two, and then get rid of them. I have done that consistently since I started this blog in August 2012. The point is to keep the focus here on evolving the architecture and users; getting on with the task of helping more users become capable and self reliant at a computer. Even if you really do prefer the passenger seat, you first need a thorough test drive in the drivers seat to be sure you made the right choice. You can never truly have this with Mac OS. You can still do all the offline things you like on Mac OS, and even online things you know aren't a security risk; like visiting a trusted website.
So in the spirit of keeping the focus on the helpful content here, I never really let negativity linger here.
The only things I have kept here are a fraction of the content that dealt with Low End Mac, and only because of the extreme eagerness of Dan Knight to encourage devolution. He is the worst of the worst. That information is on a whole other plane than negativity. It's more like a legitimate warning to stay away from a devolved cult.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment